Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Chastity-model-031 - (x61)  

  1. #1
    Banned
    Joined
    4 Jan 2015
    Posts
    2,629
    Likes
    38,915
    Images
    463,838

    Chastity-model-031 - (x61)






  2. #2
    Elite Prospect
    Joined
    10 Dec 2013
    Posts
    1,316
    Likes
    1,601
    Images
    7

    Re: Chastity-model-031 - (x61)

    Howdy,

    You have some delightful stuff... However, a download link (like Zippy) would be awesome.

    Thanks,

    Hotty

  3. #3
    Member hot4lolita's Avatar
    Joined
    19 May 2014
    Posts
    101
    Likes
    138
    Images
    0

    Re: Chastity-model-031 - (x61)

    Nice but not having luck uploading images

  4. #4
    Banned
    Joined
    20 Oct 2014
    Posts
    806
    Likes
    7,374
    Images
    10,005

    Re: Chastity-model-031 - (x61)

    Such a great set! Hope you are also posting some more of Chastity, THC? Be great to see more sets not yet posted on VG...

  5. #5
    Banned
    Joined
    4 Jan 2015
    Posts
    2,629
    Likes
    38,915
    Images
    463,838

    Re: Chastity-model-031 - (x61)

    Thank you

  6. #6
    Member
    Joined
    30 Jul 2011
    Posts
    68
    Likes
    48
    Images
    1

    Re: Chastity-model-031 - (x61)

    In one of her earliest sets, numbered somewhere around 2 or 3 as best I recall, she was wearing a pair of short shorts that didn't fit especially tight around the uppermost thighs, leaving more to see than someone (her or the photographer or the site manager?) wanted. This was corrected by using a tool, likely Photoshop, to grab a part of the image where there was shorts and using it to cover up the part where too much was shown. It was obvious, when you looked closely, that someone had done this, to keep it all covered up. It also seemed pretty apparent, judging from the expressions on Chastity's face, that she couldn't have cared less how much she was showing. In fact, there is no way that she could not have known. But the only versions of that set, that I ever found, were versions where the modification had been applied. Perhaps the originals were never published, and perhaps they no longer even exist. But I wish ...

    Edit: I just looked for it, and according to the non-numbered index I found, it would be #7, the pink shorts with the shoe lace type lacing in front. The modification is apparent in fact if you look at the full-sized pic from the 7th thumbnail here:

    https://vipergirls.to/threads/779142-...light=chastity

  7. Liked by 1 user: whitepantylover

  8. #7
    Elite Prospect senskin's Avatar
    Joined
    12 Jan 2012
    Posts
    3,337
    Likes
    44,654
    Images
    50,652

    Re: Chastity-model-031 - (x61)

    She looks good. Just not good enough to deal with the crappy image host.

  9. #8
    Banned
    Joined
    20 Oct 2014
    Posts
    806
    Likes
    7,374
    Images
    10,005

    Re: Chastity-model-031 - (x61)

    You are right humptydumpty! Just checked set 007 and there are quite a few images that have been clearly photoshopped -and quite a bad job done of it too. Highly doubt the originals would have been published....

    By the way, on another topic, the image host being used above has stopped working for me over the last few days - I keep getting a "The connection was reset" error message. I think it might be to do with a recent browser and/or OS update... Am I the only one?

    Quote Originally Posted by humptydumpty View Post
    In one of her earliest sets, numbered somewhere around 2 or 3 as best I recall, she was wearing a pair of short shorts that didn't fit especially tight around the uppermost thighs, leaving more to see than someone (her or the photographer or the site manager?) wanted. This was corrected by using a tool, likely Photoshop, to grab a part of the image where there was shorts and using it to cover up the part where too much was shown. It was obvious, when you looked closely, that someone had done this, to keep it all covered up. It also seemed pretty apparent, judging from the expressions on Chastity's face, that she couldn't have cared less how much she was showing. In fact, there is no way that she could not have known. But the only versions of that set, that I ever found, were versions where the modification had been applied. Perhaps the originals were never published, and perhaps they no longer even exist. But I wish ...

    Edit: I just looked for it, and according to the non-numbered index I found, it would be #7, the pink shorts with the shoe lace type lacing in front. The modification is apparent in fact if you look at the full-sized pic from the 7th thumbnail here:

    https://vipergirls.to/threads/779142-...light=chastity

Posting Permissions