Juliet Model - Set 40 - (x61)

[T900]

[java_head]

Why are your webeweb sets so small? the originals were not that small.

[jonesdave]

Why are your webeweb sets so small? the originals were not that small.

Well, I can't speak for the OP, but I just had a look on Wayback and the sample images from her site (in 2005) were exactly the same size, 853 x 1280. I don't remember them being much bigger than this. This agrees with the exif info for the sample image.

EDIT:
Unless you're talking about the number of pics? In which case, as far as I can tell, her sets ranged from 30 odd to 80 odd pics, so 61 looks reasonable.

[woodsman69]

Well, I can't speak for the OP, but I just had a look on Wayback and the sample images from her site (in 2005) were exactly the same size, 853 x 1280. I don't remember them being much bigger than this. This agrees with the exif info for the sample image.

EDIT:
Unless you're talking about the number of pics? In which case, as far as I can tell, her sets ranged from 30 odd to 80 odd pics, so 61 looks reasonable.

i agree....pic sizes appear to be correct, checked against other set originals and all looks good....soooo goooooooddddd!! hehe. ty for the post !

[T900]

you are right! thank you for this explanation

[T900]

reupload

[T900]

reupload