vipr.im - support

[Obsessy]

Vipr.im or IMX.to doesn't make much difference here, they all get taken down. There is no point in switching between these hosts to avoid DMCA takedowns.

I don't Agree. (Imx) clearly keeps files for a very much longer time compared to (Vipr).

And There is a point in changing hosts, because that means Flexibility.

[Malenia]

I've been waiting for payment for 2 weeks now

[alonzoh]

My browser freezes on galleries with this fucking host.

[zwixxx]

My browser freezes on galleries with this fucking host.

Work fine for me with Firefox.

Have you got BulkImageDownloader installed ? - makes downloading from that host most easy.

[zwixxx]

Can you give Firefox a try ?

[Progishness]

Clearing the site cookies is always worth a try - you never know.

[I have no problems with vipr.im and Pale Moon - my browser of choice for VG and related sites as it supports IHG.]

[roger33]

21 December 2024

If you can't see any thumbnails, this is the reason. Just wait for 12-24 hours.

[celebbloger]

Vipr.im is under maintainence, Uploading will resume shortly.
Refresh this page in some minutes.



When will the upload work again?

[rapidleach]

does vipr.im support API for uploading images?

[CarmenPorter]

Failed error...

[Progishness]

I don't Agree. (Imx) clearly keeps files for a very much longer time compared to (Vipr).

And There is a point in changing hosts, because that means Flexibility.

Indeed IMX is known to have a very long retention times - many sets posted there over 10 years ago still have good working links. I have noticed with vipr.im however that random images tend to go missing from picture sets, which is why I stopped using it.

As regards DCMA takedowns - that is out of our hands, but on occasion it can help if you strip the Metadata from the image set (something I'm normally reluctant to do).

The FastStone Viewer has a powerful tool for doing this.

[Lurkio]

As regards DCMA takedowns - that is out of our hands, but on occasion it can help if you strip the Metadata from the image set (something I'm normally reluctant to do).

Aside from that top tip, even something as basic as not using the original filenames as used by the original publishing adult site can also help keep a set up for longer.

And yes, I appreciate the fact that some folks around here are OCD enough to want the original filename information as part of their collections, but sometimes, and especially with content that's from a site that's very proactive about DMCA and/or that's been uploaded and then reuploaded (and taken down) multiple times to/from different hosts over a period of time, you do just have to bite the bullet and rename a set with generic filenames e.g. 001, 002, 003, etc., in order to get the content to upload somewhere.

[Progishness]

There are plenty of workarounds if you can be bothered to try them.

[Progishness]

I've just noticed that vipr.im is now employing age verification when *accessing from the UK - it's asking for a facial scan - Has anyone else encountered this?

*opening an image

[twat]

I've just noticed that vipr.im is now employing age verification when *accessing from the UK - it's asking for a facial scan - Has anyone else encountered this?

*opening an image

That would be due to ofcom's Online Safety Act going into effect recently and them not wanting to pay fines of up to £18 million or 10% of global revenue.

You'll be seeing a lot more of that I'd imagine... use a VPN server located outside of the UK or send them a good AI-generated selfie.