Liked by 90 users: 1jeffy, 45marco45, aguynamedme, albainthenet, arche2016, Barabar, bert123, boashire, boater, bongobob, Brickhouse, brownnote, Carina69, clonaid, CmanMN, coopz, cprffv, DarkFox, davidlorenz8711, Davik985,dead, delbret, Dick Sneider, dozer, drmantis, DwightFry, elleon12vg, fajnelaski, flap769, gokkunfan, Hammrd, hans05, Hepburn, hpgas, jamesticoro, jarhead0311, jethro, jmedicis, jumbie9, kalsakings, KimYongJul, klanobulk, Kuddles, Lady, levian616, listenerdave, llppoo, luissera, luvhotbabes15, mal99, mclaa0654, Med1980, merlinsdragon, metmet1213, mewantlove, mgear, n3w, northof48, nunya1967, ofProto, oolgi,otherwisestfu, Paladin24, pedroc, Pichunter, pizovme, plaski, powercharger, profviolao, r0cks, renette007, Revelation, rinotmet, sasa123, senskin, showknees, Sid Ifrit, SOMM, spackman, Starlight, stevethelong, streetdreamz, theLeeman, Till, todd2426, vinrossi, ViperGirls_1980, vsking, w1drng22, wgpldz
reup
Nice see-through top.
MC link added!
Liked by 1 user: spackman
Thanks for the Mirrorcreator link. Thanks for the set too!
Thanks for the set, but what's with the downgraded quality? It's all fuzzy.
Sometimes the sets get originally uploaded to imagehosts that automatically downgrade image quality (ex: imgch|li) - Then they get re-shared repeatedly on the web in the downgraded form. It's mainly due to the original poster, whoever and wherever it was (not the one here, mind you.) That's the problem with all these fuzzy images from the Silver network.
Other imagehosts do not automatically downgrade image quality. Examples are Imagebam, Imgbox, et al. The resolution stays the same as well as the image clarity/quality/size.