Liked by 178 users: 2018, 5tarl0rd, andper, andrei_boris, Andrew66, animaddness, Anton1964, antoniosss, Apterol, arche2016, astro224, bakaona, band, barney30, Bazaus, blackdog9, blaqk, blues, Bmajor, Boardwolf, bobbyp, boryf, Boyscout1, brfritos, Brock, charmanders, Cheshire, chester101, chris82, chubwub, cjr82, countblah, cyphergallery, datfoot, DavidArnett, davidlorenz8711, debiant, demonbass, Dick Sneider, dj_serban, dking2011, donncalef, Dreamfield, dsnake, dWiz, erik666, Ev0lver, fafreddy65, fertippt, fkprm28gtarfz6tuj543, flawerek, freshsaver, frizzo, gaatar0,garth1, goldpackx, GoldSubMariner, Gorgonzilla, Grash13, greenlemon, grizzly67, GuavusMax, hentaim, Hibris, HiGlove, iscariah666, James Jameson, JayElRoyo, jdykers, Jenkemdealer, jethro, jimmyoooo, jm320, julass, k00lDJ, killereg666, Kosadres, Kreecher, Kropotkin, ktarmok, kuo0110, kwd37, laalaalulu, leoa, Lepiota, letolxxx, Lidalove, linsomniac, Lipator, Luzbel Wolf, m6284505, machinegoesping, maruffel, MatadorSS, mewantlove, mill666, Moldenzy2016, moliko561zup,MR69, mrallroy, mrcorvette427, mrluta, mynastyfantasy, n3w, narcizze, Naturepal, Nesnahmik, New_User_5, Nudist21, obarrigas, oolgi, Patmc75, pauki, pedroc, percy weasly, peris78, petrnikolaev, Pichunter, PornFiend, qidui, QuarK, rabiesneko, rana7, Redwolf1, renette007, ret56jan, Rickardur85, rigamort, rodent11, rollymo, rommel, Romualdo, RonV, sanskubu, ScouseEd75, shigachan0, Shinobu, Silverhawk2650, Simon, skyfallseige, sobegod00, ssg1492, suede684, sugarfree66, superbiggulps, supertheo, tafkapj, Tamere92, tata1021yau, tequilamb, texas00, Thales, thargor73, ThorTheRock, tigerfaust2, timhutch40, TNS4351, todd2426, TotalCarnage, totorodono, trevh, tubeyou_ohah, ultimate01, urbano, ushama, vagetarian, vankerr999, vegger, velvet, vgec1976, virtuoz2000, voegi, volari90, willy1, wolfman, woodbridge_sub, zombeta, zsofibuttplug
I've yet to see one Alice set from MarvelCharm that was well done. The word "boring" comes up every time a new set surfaces. Sexiness is somewhere in the outer reaches.
Now, I'm not slamming Picaflor or other posters -- this certainly isn't your fault. Your contributions are appreciated. And I can't blame the model. But I entirely blame the photographer for not having an ounce of creativity or imagination whatsoever, let alone professionalism. And from looking over the shots -- just in this set -- I also doubt he (or she) has had any formal training in photography: rookie mistakes are way too obvious.
Sad, given the subject matter.
Liked by 5 users: alex777777, BlinkyMcSpanky, Drakhor, Kreecher, TooLoose DaHeck
I think that their strategy to combat piracy is to produce material that people don't want to steal. I generally save a pic from each set only to have proof that I've seen it.
Liked by 3 users: BlinkyMcSpanky, dennisfrenchman, Kreecher
Compared to the creative TMTV and SilverStarlets sets and not to mention with this set the sub 25% hit rate nailing focus [in a controlled environment with virtually identical poses] I agree, although formal training is not necessarily a prerequisite.Originally Posted by Apterol
The effort to upload is always appreciated
Liked by 1 user: Kreecher
I have made a number of posts with suggestions on simple basics to improve the photography, but they seem to not want to hear any of it. As long as people buy sets and they can keep their production costs at a rock-bottom minimum, what is their incentive to change? When I was shooting as a pro any shot not in perfect focus or composition was never seen by the customer. If some of these studios held those standards, we'd still be waiting to see the first pics. After the first 5 Lili handbra and NN sets I knew that they were going to milk each and every model for as long as they could. Fooled once, shame on you. Fooled twice, shame on me. These models have shelf life and sadly it has passed for most of them, even if they were to make a smart move to a place like MET. If one looks at the overall quality of a set, almost all of these models peaked 3 or 4 years ago when they were 15. Alice at 15 wearing skimpy shirts is way hotter than current "filled out" Alice and the stagnant handbra poses. Trump will be in his second term before we see her nips again. I feel bad for these models who are simply wasting their productive years.
Liked by 3 users: alex777777, Kreecher, Silverhawk2650
Wrong.
Liked by 1 user: BlinkyMcSpanky
As for the nip sighting, there is a huge slip in the set where she has the boa. Happy Hunting!!
Liked by 1 user: Kreecher
It wouldn´t be that huge, because I can´t find it.
This set isn't the worst compare to some of the last she's done... I wouldn't say that the problem is technical at all... I am not a professional photographer but it doesn't come up to me that there is an obvious problem regarding technic... The problem is about expectation and EROTIC dimention... the first prerequisite for EROTIC photoshoot is to get a model AGREEING with explicite (SOFTCORE=POSE) nude shots... Scenario of a SET should be a complete striptease: The TEASE should be granted by a FLASH, and the FLASH preceded by a TEASE, TEASE and FLASH go together IT CAN'T WORK with ONE without the OTHER... Nudity management in relation with the model is a major problem... There're plenty of "cockteasers" ruling in the British sites as well that shouldn't be where they are, or shouldn't be given that much attention and credits... THE GIRLS DO WHAT THEY WANT, they are free to do NONUDE if they wish so, BUT don't sell me their crap as EROTIC please!!! pb is that poeple are chasing them that bad (with the hope they do slip a nip or open their legs once) that they gain a lot of money value! and Producers play with it ("Alice topless" they claim so many times ... lol)...
Liked by 1 user: Kreecher
It's actually quite noticeable and in the set called Dusk there is another one and in the video for Red there is another. She's doing things similar to what she's done in the past. Keep looking and you'll find it.
Liked by 1 user: Kreecher
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote