ViperGirls Photoshoot #015 - Ria

[VTR]

ViperGirl #15: Ria


Photos by independent photographer phoenix128.

[Quantrill]

Beautiful model

[RagnaRock]

This girl reminds me of Shae, from Thrones.

Yeah a bit, but makes me think more of Sarah Silverman

[Phdamp]

This girl reminds me of Shae, from Thrones.

Yes i agree great model

[pervmann2000]

Goodlooking girl and erotic enough to give it a 8...thanks once more...

[porky]

might be weird but I really like her nails

[cblknittights]

We're just looking at what's popular and processing comments for now. Next shoot for April 1 will have more muff and pucker shots.

Here is my comments, I am going to preface this with: I get that tastes vary and operating this site and finding that median path is difficult...

First, Finally a girl that is not some emaciated anorexic bony thing! And with some TITS! Itty bitty don't work for me! This is an excellent model choice... Rinse, REPEAT! *cough* REDHEADS *cough* would be a plus too! HINT HINT!

As for the shoot itself... for ME starting off half dressed is not my first choice... I actually would rather she had a shirt on to start and then a much slower striptease. IOW more shots clothed, and possibly teasing whats underneath then stripping off a little bit at a time.... Some proper shoes and hosiery also would be a plus for ME . I will use the caveat that these should match inline with the outfit.. so don't do like some sites and stick some bunch of huge 9 inch stilettos on the model! Or those heinous disgusting converse sneakers ... you want to kill a mood that will do it!

Overall the set is 9! Model with tits! Not emaciated! Thats 8 out 10 there!

[darthvengeant]

Decent set. She appears to have nice skin, unless that is post-editing. Nice to see a few "behind the model" shots, though you still need to do some when she is nude. The model seems a bit "stiff" in her poses.

Finally a girl that is not some emaciated anorexic bony thing! And with some TITS!

"Emaciated" is relative sir. What you call "emaciated and bony" is very beautiful to many people such as myself. So is small breasts, I prefer them, but I don't see what that has to do with the set.

I don't think a personal attraction preference should weigh on a photographers set quality.

Art is universal.

[CodyBritts]

Love it!!! ^_^

[snkpornman]

Looks great man. WD!

[Sandy Meyers]

Best pics:

[h78scorpion]

cute girl but still no heels nor stockings, disappointed !

[iokana]

nice but could be more posing))

[mushfiq]

Cute baby!

[cblknittights]

"Emaciated" is relative sir. What you call "emaciated and bony" is very beautiful to many people such as myself. So is small breasts,

Here is my comments, I am going to preface this with: I get that tastes vary and operating this site and finding that median path is difficult...

First, with a RE-ITERATION of the above....

If I can see their ribs, and their hip bones, and it looks like a slight breeze might blow them over, they are EMACIATED! BELCH! Same with lack of to small breasts... to pancakes that look like they are on some skeleton... none of that is appealing in the least.

Real women have curves! The model here is on the low end of that, but is A HUGE IMPROVEMENT over some before, and many sets herein.

I don't think a personal attraction preference should weigh on a photographers set quality.

Well it does... I could CARE LESS ABOUT the photographer! The set quality is made up by:

1) MODEL!
a) Tits C,D, DD 34+ - Hint Scoreland type crap is that crap, BLECH! Yes there is too big, just as too small to flat chested.
b) Not some emaciated anorexic - IOW if I can see their bones and count ribs TOO THIN!
c) Red hair, Black Hair, Brown Hair, and mixes of Redish-x, and then blonde
d) Too much ink kills the goose! Suicide Girls is not my thing! A little I can deal, too much ala most SG, next please!

2) Setting - There is one "producer" cough Only cough which uses the same tired sets over and over and over! Especially a certain PINK BEDROOM! I would much rather see plain backgrounds with a few props, couch, chair, NO BEDS, please! GAWD! Sets like Zishy in the real world or something close to it are great... Zishy lacks the nudity in most sets, by their own choice, at least from what I read.. but most of these models are definitely keepers, a few definitely are not my thing..

3) Wardrobe - As you can get from my user name hosiery is a big thing, especially cable knit tights, and school uniforms, PROPER UNIFORMS! Again cough *Only* cough has sets with ill fitting uniforms, stilettos on SGU, etc... no bra's under uniforms, DO IT RIGHT! If it wouldn't pass muster in a UK school, then its WRONG! This applies to any wardrobe not just SGU. This applies in real life too! Girls need to learn how to dress themselves! Only has these BTS sets and they are actually better than some of their sets! Anyway proper wardrobe be it as basic as some leggings, and a t-shirt with some nice flats, a decent bra and panties, can be better than just sticking a model in some outfit that she can't fit into to start!

I prefer them, but I don't see what that has to do with the set.

It has everything to do with the set. I am not sure what the point of these sets and the site venturing into producing them... I have an idea. Since I don't know the ins and outs of its operations, they are guesses at best... Again I have a theory, more power to them!

They asked for input, I am providing my input. You've provided yours. Even as disparate as these are...the operator can review and decide how they wish to go forward... If they go with the anorexic itty bitty titty club, then I won't be downloading them, and I doubt the goal of these sets will be realised with those in the same view as mine.

Art is universal.

I've heard that BS alot over the decades, and I've got news for you. No it is not. Art and beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and a lot of these past sets don't rate too high on my scale. This is the first one to crack over about a 6...Itty bitty little girls who might break if you touch them, and look like poster child for some food relief group don't cut it, with me.

Its like a certain area of this site which operates what would be a major crime in my area... You can pass these sets off as "art" all you want! They are a good way to get arrested in this area! No matter how much clothes and other stuff you want to pile on, or any of the other reasons I've heard and seen posted... thats just disgusting,,, most of those "models" are below 16, and that is just well disgusting. Same with some other areas ie: Suicide Girls area, and then there is the faggot/tranny filth... NONE of that is art! Period. Whats sad is that "art model" area gets 10-20x the view hits as real girls with bodies!

I'd like to see sets with decent models, and in wardrobe and settings which are a little more close to reality than some of the same tired old sets... Hell some of those casting sets are way better than some.. But having a model which doesn't look like they've been starved their entire life definitely improves the set.

Other artsy fartsy stuff don't interest me, nor does who the photographer is.