Every once in a rare while, I'll see a picture that makes me wonder,
"Okay, guys, what is going on here? And why?
Is this stuff supposed to be sexy, or non-sexy?
Is some artsy-fartsy guy so damn shallow, stupid, or self-absorbed,
that he simply does not realize that he's making this lady look sadly and unintentionally clownish,
in terms of how big her butt is, compared to the rest of her?
And, why the hell would he do this to BETTY, of all people?
She always seemed nice, to me, before this.
Did she say something that pissed off the photographer?
Or. did she refuse to have sex with him, at the end of the shoot, when he was expecting it, and wanting it?
Seriously -- why would ANY professional photographer publish a figure shot like THIS?
Was he TRYING to make the lady look like she has a really huge, huge, oversized, extra-wide butt???
Because, in all seriousness, this looks like an abstract sculpture by Renoir, or maybe Henry Moore . . .
Plus, even though it supposedly was a nude set, he never showed us a damn thing . . ."
Last edited by wooder; 1st January 2016 at 08:24.