-
31st January 2025, 11:09
#1
XLGirls Lila Lovely - Here Cums Lila Lovely - x 110 - 3000px - January 30, 2025
Last edited by CYPHER; 31st January 2025 at 19:03.
-
Liked by 57 users:
AnsloreTrigger, Antiarch, Archon, ATKFan2000, aybeone, b0ng, billton2021, boobs, Bootyaddict, btmn, caerlesbi, chozo, Cookcook123, cutepolarbear, Dick Sneider, donncalef, eViking, Hanbei, horgamm, IverWoody, Jack Purcell, JacksMafia, James Jameson, JayElRoyo, Jimmy99, Johan01, Kiljaeden7, Kimberlee20, kmjn78, Kuni, lingxi3328, Lornalover, Markjeans, nihilistic, Nuttenkutte, ophil69, OX11, Phalacus, pukimakkau, RadDaddy, reXat, rexonav8xd, roberto666, RsXvg, Ryzenlong, Sneeka, Spoe1957, Thewooops, thighs, thms192, Trinpaul, urasan40, ushama, viperpit, wheeliebob05, ZackFair, zb007
-
31st January 2025, 11:37
#2
Active Member
XLGirls Re: Lia Lovely - Here Cums Lila Lovely - x 110 - 3000px - January 30, 2025

Originally Posted by
CYPHER
Slight typo in the name/title. You have "Lia Lovely" instead of "Lila Lovely" after right "XLGirls". Ended up confusing for with another model who is named Lia Lovely.
-
-
31st January 2025, 16:15
#3
Elite Prospect
XLGirls Re: Lia Lovely - Here Cums Lila Lovely - x 110 - 3000px - January 30, 2025
-
-
31st January 2025, 21:20
#4
Private Member
XLGirls Re: Lila Lovely - Here Cums Lila Lovely - x 110 - 3000px - January 30, 2025
This is a really interesting set, aside from being a tableau of clean, pink pneumatic flesh. Lila Lovely has been working since 2015, mostly for SV/PP, and when she started out, she was a porker, her belly was so big it was difficult to see her pussy. When it was revealed it showed the kind of damage skin gets when buried in moist fat, creases and pimples. In SV3587 she was developing stretch marks on her marbled lower belly. I didn't save many shots of her undercarriage, as she had the kind of brown skin in the folds that comes from repeated bouts with fungus infections. Where does a model like that go from age 35 to 45 (according to Boobpedia)? In the dumpster of course, massive stretch marks, and boobs beat up from years of being hauled around by industrial strength bras.
Yet somehow none of that is the case, she's lost a ton of weight and became a narrow-waisted pawg type, with a clean protruding vulva, exceptional. Where did the stretch marks go? For example, check out her November 2024 PP video (3829). Now, that must be a "legacy" set, because she's been much thinner in her XL work over the past three years, say, but it doesn't even look like the same girl. Is this "Lila Lovely" her younger sister, using her modeling name?
Compare the titties. In her mid-teens pictures, she had noticeable veins that barely appear here. Makeup? Or . . . hmmm . . . are we looking at AI modified images?? #061 does like kind of stretched, as some AI images turn out, a bit non-human in proportion. If so, I'm not complaining, congratulations to the artist, and I wouldn't be shocked. Veins don't just go away, nor do creases and stretch marks.
-
-
31st January 2025, 23:39
#5
Private Member
XLGirls Re: Lila Lovely - Here Cums Lila Lovely - x 110 - 3000px - January 30, 2025
Most pics you see from the photo galleries of any "professional" site are edited to shit. It's as easy as looking for the video version of a set, you'll see way more stretch marks and imperfections on a video, more difficult to hide and lighting is usually worse.
This set in particular seems to be really filtered, the ones where she's bending over standing and the last four photos look heavily edited, like the brilliance or brightness is bumped up. In general, her skin looks way more smooth than it should.
"What is bravery without a dash of recklessness?"

-
-
1st February 2025, 01:43
#6
Private Member
XLGirls Re: Lila Lovely - Here Cums Lila Lovely - x 110 - 3000px - January 30, 2025
I wouldn't say most, certainly no one took an airbrush to her PP pic sets, they even left in bruises on one of her breasts. But models who generally did not get airbrushed did so on occasion, even Nadine Jansen on her own website washed out her veins in a few sets (airbrush in modern terms would be "shopping" I suppose). Other big girls like Anorie were never fixed, her skin was a bloody mess, and it's all there to see. I don't recall Samantha being cleaned up (until I did it).
Is the above set altered? It must be, it seems, although I don't have her later work on XL to compare (I don't save hardcore pics, my dick or no dick). For example, picture #021 doesn't appear to have been worked on much, notice the wrinkles on the inside cleavage. Now compare the nipples with #044. Standing up changed the color and shape of the areola? Smoothed out the tubercles? No.
I just wonder how, did they use traditional tools, or AI? There's a few hints it may have been the latter, I've seen some AI work on porn models that are indistinguishable from reality, but there are some tell tales, like body to head positioning, and proportions. Do I care that it was altered? Do I care if it's even a person at all? I do not.
Last edited by zorro6204; 1st February 2025 at 02:28.
-
-
1st February 2025, 03:22
#7
-
-
25th March 2025, 13:14
#8
Active Member
XLGirls Re: Lila Lovely - Here Cums Lila Lovely - x 110 - 3000px - January 30, 2025
At least in this case it's done well, not like the crap retouching we see in Chloe Vevrier's pictures for the last 20 years.
-
-
25th March 2025, 15:19
#9
Private Member
XLGirls Re: Lila Lovely - Here Cums Lila Lovely - x 110 - 3000px - January 30, 2025
I'm more of a plumper guy rather than slim and stacked, but I have a number of her pictures, all 20 years old of course (she would now be 56 according to Boobpedia). It doesn't appear that her pics with Bettie were altered, their are veins and bra lines, and there quite are a lot of skin imperfections in her early Score work. But when you get to her later personal website stuff, yeah, she looks more like a silicone doll. A lot of boob inflation without getting particularly chubby, but Boobpedia claims she's natural.
-
Posting Permissions