Approved Hosts & Banned Hosts

[Sxhd]

My Personal opinion on this..

This looks like a drama between three people (A,B,C)

So Let's say A is Vipergirls, B is kittykats and C is Filejoker.
Seeing from this situation, A doesn't like B and B doesn't like A BUT C(Filejoker) is Friends with both A and B (Has Neutral feeling about both A(vipergirls) and B(kittykats) and won't Prioritize A above B or B above A, they want to keep their relationship EQUAL, Regardless of whatever drama A and B has to deal with.

Considering this above situation from this post, For me, it seems A despises B and A(Vipergirls) demands C(Filejoker) that if they want to continue to be friends and good relationship, they must stop involving their relationship with B(kittykats), which a business company wouldn't do(also it's Childish).

Unless C(Filejoker) made a mistake which is unacceptable, it's not fair to punish C (just for the sake of it's interest to continue having relationship with everyone, it's a business)

My personal favorites are k2s,tezfiles,fileboom,rapidgator, depositfiles

However, i've noticed that people who choose to upload links to filejoker have been uploading rare collection of videos, by banning filejoker for a mistake which they didnt commit and ignoring the uploaders who had chosen filejoker has their favorites, we(myself and other users) will be missing fine collection of good quality video which couldn't be acquired by us due to regional blocking.

So consider changing your decision admin

[PornGuy68]

Well said! It is like we are in HS and you can't be my friend if you stay friends with that other person who I dislike. Meanwhile you are penalizing posters who spent many 100's of hours building up a thread.

[PornGuy68]

So any host with ties to another competing site that you have problems with will also be put on the banned list? Can you point to anything the FJ/FS did directly to Viper that would deserve a ban or is it only because they have ties to the other site? ( If you wanna be my friend you can't be friends with the other person ) I last heard that in high school.

[nisamo]

but better filejoker accept please. this filehost don't have problem with payment credit card. but keep2share still have problem

[KK1]

Hi,
Why is Filejoker banned from posting an alternative download?.

A reply be much appreciated.

Best Regards.

KK1

[V]

VG is part of a porn tube network as some of you may know. There has been a change of ownership last month. It was rather messy due the friction between people from Eastern European countries and tantrums about extra compensation being demanded for atrocities committed. Yes, it's that silly.

Not much to do about filejoker. I got a чорт ні last I asked. What I can tell is that in absolute links being posted, filejoker was the most used host surpassing keep2share but in clicks it did worse than rapidgator. I can't access file hosting accounts myself to verify statistics or see metrics so anything from my side at this point would just be guessing. At this point it is behind the scenes drama I'm not involved with.

[KK1]

Hi,
Many thanks for the reply so it's all to do with porno politics.

Clarified FILEJOKER as been permantely BANNED From ViperGirls?!

[V]

Wouldn't say permanent. Rather, until further notice.

[PetitBidou]

Is there a peculiar reason to ban imgbb or is there any chance it could be approved one day?

[V]

It's banned for no other reason than it not having made it in the approved image hosts list which consists of a limited number of image hosts.

[javbig]

Please return filejoker

[V]

We'll see at the end of the year. We need to rework the distribution of file hosts anyway. During the time filejoker.net was allowed, there were more filejoker links posted than keep2share on a daily basis. But the click rate was at best 1/100th of keep2share. It's illogical for it to return if all that file host brings is countless posters saturating the forum with material that's not being downloaded. I don't have access to filejoker's webmaster stats but I doubt it tells a different story on their end.

I'm also developing a modification that tracks unique file host links that prevents the same file host link from being re-posted within a month, to curb the endless re-posts. The focus will move to quality rather than quantity. I may introduce a sort of upvote / downvote system as well so that the spammy low quality content gets less visibility. This would be a rolling 24 hour metric pushing threads with more upvotes higher on the page list. This may in fact help filejoker as many users like to remind me filejoker brought unique content.

[MsCaramelCunt]

We'll see at the end of the year. We need to rework the distribution of file hosts anyway. During the time filejoker.net was allowed, there were more filejoker links posted than keep2share on a daily basis. But the click rate was at best 1/100th of keep2share. It's illogical for it to return if all that file host brings is countless posters saturating the forum with material that's not being downloaded. I don't have access to filejoker's webmaster stats but I doubt it tells a different story on their end.

I'm also developing a modification that tracks unique file host links that prevents the same file host link from being re-posted within a month, to curb the endless re-posts. The focus will move to quality rather than quantity. I may introduce a sort of upvote / downvote system as well so that the spammy low quality content gets less visibility. This would be a rolling 24 hour metric pushing threads with more upvotes higher on the page list. This may in fact help filejoker as many users like to remind me filejoker brought unique content.

plenty of good news in two paragraphs, voting system sounds good.

[Lurkio]

For reference, the following four sites on the approved imagehost list all currently require sign up and login in order to upload files to their service:

depic.me
imgcredit.xyz
picstate.com
pimpandhost.com

[V]

Thank you for your report. I'll see what to do but likely ban these hosts. I am against forced registration.

And anti-CP is no excuse anymore as that can easily be checked on-upload or after-upload in the background and removed within seconds. Nowadays all the CP/CSAM services have good working API's.